Tuesday, September 28, 2010

Research: implant tooth replacement better than root resection



Sep 22, 2010
By Gordon J. Christensen, DDS, MSD, PhD

Two groups of patients were studied in the retrospective project. Fifty-six mandibular first or first and second molars were treated by hemisection and crowns. In a second group, molars were extracted and first or first and second molars were replaced with implants. All patients were observed for at least four years.

Sixty-eight percent of the hemisected teeth and 89% of the implant group remained free of complications. The hemisected group had a higher incidence of unsalvageable complications. (Gregory-George Z et al. Mandibular molar root resection versus implant therapy: a retrospective nonrandomized study. J Oral Implantol. 2009; 35(2):52-62)

Dr. Gordon Christensen comments: We have observed this same comparison over many years of clinical practice. When adequate bone is present for implants, implants appear to be the most adequate treatment. When inadequate bone is present and extensive grafting is not acceptable to the patient, hemisection and splinted crowns are a good alternative.

Nov./Dec. 2009 Guide for Preferred Clients
Vol. 14, Issue 6


No comments:

Post a Comment